Pages

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

The Mysterious Molasses Markings of Pluto


A team of researchers led by Marc Buie of the Southwest Research Institute recently released the best Hubble images [of Pluto] to date [see above].

The data reveal an icy molasses-colored world with a surprising amount of activity. Buie compared Hubble images taken in 1994 vs. 2003 and discovered that Pluto's northern hemisphere has brightened while the southern hemisphere has dimmed. Ground-based observations suggest that Pluto's atmosphere doubled in mass during approximately the same time period. And no one is certain what's causing the molasses-colored splotches on Pluto's surface.

...

Pluto can get so cold, researchers believe, that its atmosphere can actually freeze and fall to the ground. If Earth's atmosphere did that, it would make a layer 30 feet thick, but Pluto has less to work with. When it’s on the ground, Pluto's entire blanket of air is no more than a frosty film of nitrogen and methane.

"Until the mid-1980s, Pluto's northern hemisphere was tilted away from the sun for over 100 years, accumulating a substantial amount of frost," says Buie. "Now the northern hemisphere is coming into sunlight and appears, as shown in the Hubble images, to have been growing brighter."

The atmosphere might also be changing in response to Pluto's highly eccentric orbit. During the late 1980s, Pluto approached as close to the sun as it ever gets (about 2 1/2 billion miles) and gradually started warming. Now the temperature on Pluto is up to a balmy -385 degrees Fahrenheit! Surface frosts exposed to such "warmth" may be subliming — that is, changing back into a gas.

"Pluto, right now, has the best atmosphere it's had in our lifetime," says [Mike] Brown.

And about that molasses…

Researchers think these dark areas may be primordial organic matter.

"We know there's methane on Pluto," says Brown. "Here's what we think happens: Sunlight hits the methane and breaks it apart into its chemical components -- hydrocarbons. Over millions of years this process makes a dark reddish-brown oil or tar like substance that sticks to the ground. These darker areas spread larger as they absorb more sunlight and cause additional frost to sublimate."

"Now, Pluto is headed away from the sun again," says Brown. "It will gradually get colder and colder and its atmosphere will refreeze to its surface. In fact, that should have already started happening, but apparently it has not. It's a mystery."

NASA's New Horizons probe is en route to investigate. The spacecraft left Earth in January 2006 and has been racing toward Pluto for an encounter in July 2015, hopefully before the atmosphere refreezes.

"New Horizons will map the entire sunlit portion of Pluto," says Buie. "And as it swings closer, it will get very detailed images, maybe as good as 50-100 meter resolution."

"This will allow us to explore some of the interesting areas we've pinpointed," he continues. "For example, the recent Hubble images reveal a very bright spot – brighter than anything else on Pluto – near the equator. And just to the left of that bright spot is some of the darkest terrain on Pluto's surface. We want to examine the area where these bright and dark areas are touching and figure out what's causing the differences. This is a good target because it includes every kind of terrain Pluto has to offer."

Photo credit: NASA/ESA/SWRI

3 comments:

Laurel Kornfeld said...

As a dynamic world with geology and weather, Pluto shows it has more in common with the other, bigger planets than it does with most Kuiper Belt Objects except the few large ones, which should be considered planets too. Most KBOs in Pluto’s orbital path are tiny and do not have these features. These images show that before making definitive classifications, we should first get the data and analyze it; otherwise, we are defining objects without knowing significant factors about them.

JDsg said...

I wasn't very happy with the IAU's definition of a planet and its new "dwarf planet" category. I've never written about the issue, and I think the increasing data about the characteristics of dwarf planets (and, eventually, extra-solar planets) will make any future revisions of the definitions for planets and dwarf planets problematic.

On the other hand, I don't necessarily have a problem with defining objects now without having all or even most data about them at the present. The nature of astronomy is such that revisions based upon updated information is the norm.

Laurel Kornfeld said...

Dr. Alan Stern, Principal Investigator of New Horizons, is the person who first created the term "dwarf planet," but he never meant for dwarf planets to not be considered planets at all! His intention was they are a third class of planets in addition to terrestrials and jovians. He is one of the leading astronomers opposing the IAU definition.

If you're interested in the Pluto debate, feel free to visit my Pluto Blog at http://laurele.livejournal.com